Migrate your CI/CD from Travis CI to Semaphore
- Set up your workflows hassle-free
- Deliver 2x times faster
- Improve your team’s CI/CD efficiency at every level
Download the comparison
Semaphore vs. Travis CI
By clicking “Download Now” you agree to receive occasional marketing emails from Semaphore. You also agree that your personal data will be processed in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Deliver faster and more predictably with Semaphore
Unprecedented speed and reliability
Run your CI/CD builds 2x times faster than on Travis CI. Enjoy the CI/CD solution that exceeds your expectations. Get powerful insights into how fast your pipelines are running and where you can improve.
Easy-to-read test reports
Get a clear understanding of your test suite’s health. See which tests are failing and which ones are the slowest in your test suite, identify flaky tests and see how much time it takes to run each test.
Ease of setup and maintenance
Create custom Semaphore screens that show deployment activity across multiple projects.With its intuitive UI and the Visual Workflow Builder, Semaphore makes it simple to build workflows, even for beginners. Savvy engineer? Make use of the .semaphore.yml file to build your CI/CD.
Affordable pricing
Get the best CI/CD solution at your service, from 0$ per month. Flexible pricing models allow you to choose the option that works best for your team, from startups to enterprise.
“With TravisCI, builds were flaky and these issues only occurred on TravisCI. With Semaphore, the Ruby gem builds run perfectly, no random failures, and it’s done a lot faster.”
Tom de Bruijn, developer at AppSignal
Compare Semaphore vs. Travis CI
| Semaphore | Travis CI | |
|---|---|---|
| Product type |  |
 |
| SaaS | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid: run agents on customer-managed infrastructure | Yes | No |
| On-premise option | Yes | Yes |
| Setup & Maintenance |  |
 |
| Graphical pipeline configuration | Yes. Workflow Builder: point-and-click interface to create and edit pipelines | No |
| Intuitive project dashboard | Yes. Customize the dashboard that shows your deployment activity | No. Project dashboards have limited functionality |
| GitHub support | Yes | Yes |
| Bitbucket support | Yes | Yes |
| Gitlab support | No. Planned | Yes | Command-line interface | Yes. CLI can manage projects and do everything the UI can | Yes |
| Continuous Integration | |
|
| Test results reporting and insights | Yes. See which tests passed/failed, find slowest tests to speed up development process. | No |
| Debugging feedback loop | Yes. Fast debugging via SSH access to both running and finished jobs. | Yes |
| Native artifacts storage | Yes. Semaphore can store artifacts on its side | No. You need to upload artifacts to your own AWS |
| Continuous Delivery | |
 |
| Manage multiple deployment environments | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-stage releases | Yes. Combine automatic steps with manual approval to ensure maximum reliability when delivering to users. | No |
| Automatic and manual promotions | Yes. Chain pipelines together for any CD workflow (blue/green, canary, etc). | No |
| Deployment dashboards | Yes. See which versions of all your applications have been deployed to which environment. | No |
| Deployment queues | Yes. Control which pipelines must run sequentially to prevent conflict and which may run in parallel. | No |
| Performance | |
|
| Top-of-market performance | Yes. 42%-100% faster than Travis CI workflows | No |
| Autoscaling parallelism | Yes | No |
| Allocate more CPUs and RAM to complex jobs | Yes. via official GitHub App | No |
| Built-in artifacts store | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in Docker registry | Yes | Yes |
| Support | |
|
| Email-based account and technical support | Yes | Yes |
| Video call support | Yes | No |
| Support SLAs | Yes | No |
| Custom solution engineering | Yes | No |
| Dedicated customer success manager | Yes | No |
| Private Slack channel | Yes | No |
Contact us for a demo and migration plan
Case studies
These teams have switched from Jenkins to Semaphore. Discover their ROI:
